Anti-Trust Probes in Procurement Likely

The Procurement Collusion Strike Force, formed late last year by the Justice Department, is designed to educate contractors and procurement officials about bid-rigging, as well as prosecuting offenses. 
However, some critics predict that efforts by the new group to police bid-rigging and other antitrust violations in government procurement could get off to a rocky start.
"There is a steep learning curve in the first few years," for these types of dedicated strike forces, David Douglass, partner in international law firm Sheppard Mullin's government contracts, investigations and international trade practice group, said during a Jan. 8 Coalition for Government Procurement webinar on the strike force.
Nonetheless, Douglass and his colleagues said they expect to see an increase in procurement investigations in the coming months.
The strike force is an interagency partnership that pulls in prosecutors from the DOJ's Antitrust Division, 13 U.S. Attorneys' offices and investigators from the FBI and agency Inspector General Offices.
At its launch, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, who oversees the Antitrust Division at DOJ, said that "more than one third of [the division's] 100-plus open investigations relate to public procurement or otherwise involve the government being victimized by criminal conduct."
Delrahim also said the strike force will focus on leveraging acquisition data to "identify potential red flags of collusion" and previewed a planned interagency roundtable involving data scientists from the law enforcement and inspector general communities.
Jonathan Aronie, leader of Sheppard Mullin's government contracts group, said that task forces such as those deployed against organized crime and health care fraud can be very effective. However, applying the technique to government procurement could prove tricky because of the particular intricacies of federal procurement and antitrust laws, he said.
The attorneys advised government vendors to take a look at areas in their companies where "perceived" collusion violations could raise red flags. Some of those include selling products through channels and agents, relationships with small businesses, shared office space and different prices set for the same item. The concern is that such practices could be misinterpreted by investigators who may not be familiar with commercial practices.
They advised contractors to keep a close eye on their relationships with small businesses and agents and also to work to establish compliance programs, review their risk practices, train their workers to deal with investigations and set and enforce internal controls to prevent collusion.

« Back to News

News & Tips
Government contractor news & industry tips from a source you can trust. Sign up for our weekly updates to stay informed and get involved. Easily unsubscribe at any time.

Our Insider's Guide Series was developed as an easy-to-understand series of guides to assist you through the government procurement process.

National Association of Government Contractors
1250 Connecticut Ave NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-465-3750
Toll Free: 1.800.979.NAGC
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

FedEx Shipping Discount
Office Depot Member Program
Dell Small Business
Avis Car Rental
GEICO Insurance

Privacy Policy | Subscriber Agreement & Terms of Use | Purchase Policy | Data & Cookies
Copyright © 2004 - 2020 National Association of Government Contractors.   All Rights Reserved. Geotrust RapidSSL